Forum MVP Dstone5553 Posted December 13, 2007 Forum MVP Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 Finally comes and what's sad is that this is probably just the tip of the iceberg... I think this is most of the list... One thing I noticed (being a huge cub fan) is no Sosa. Sucks that this era will be forever be tainted as the steroid era. Marvin Benard Barry Bonds Bobby Estalella Jason Giambi Jeremy Giambi Benito Santiago Gary Sheffield Randy Velarde Lenny Dysktra David Segui Larry Bigbie Brian Roberts Jack Cust Tim Laker Josias Manzanillo Todd Hundley Mark Carreon Hal Morris Matt Franco Rondell White Roger Clemens Andy Pettite Chuck Knoblauch Jason Grimsley Greg Zaun David Justice F.P. Santangello Glenallen Hill Mo Vaughn Denny Neagle Ron Villone Ryan Franklin Chris Donnels Todd Williams Phil Hiatt Todd Pratt Kevin Young Mike Lansing Cody Mckay Kent Mercker Andy Piatt Miguel Tejada Jason Christianson Mike Stanton Stephen Randolph Jerry Hairston Jr. Paul Lo Duca Adam Riggs Bart Miadich Chad Allen Fernando Vina Kevin Brown Eric Gagne Mike Bell Matt Herges Gary Bennett Jr. Jim Parque Brandon Donnelly Jeff Williams Howie Clark Nook Logan Daniel Naulty Rick Ankiel Paul Byrd Jay Gibbons Troy Glaus Jose Guillen Gary Matthews, Jr. Scott Schoeneweis Jose Canseco Jason Grimsley Darren Holmes John Rocker Ismael Valdez Matt Williams Steve Woodard David Bell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forum MVP FunkyBass13 Posted December 13, 2007 Forum MVP Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 Part of that reason Stone, is that almost all of the "testimony" came from 2 people: one trainer from the Yankees and one clubhouse staffer from the Mets. If these many names come out from people on two teams, imagine what else is out there. I don't condone cheating but seriously, how is it that baseball is being singled out when we all know that the NFL has some of the biggest monsters in pro sports? Many of the people playing Safety now are the size of defensive linemen from the 80s. Is it because we have a desire fore football players to be mean and nasty and try and break people in half every week? Seems more than a bit hypocritical to me. Again, I am not a fan of cheating and it sends a disgusting message to the kids that look up to these athletes(as I'm sure many of us did when we were younger), but chemical enhancements have been a part of professional sports since forever. "Greenies" have been more common than Gatorade in MLB since at least the 60s. Football players used to do tons of cocaine to dull the pain and make them more agressive since at least the 70s. Basketball players smoke a lot of dope because......well because it makes you feel good But I digress. If this is really such a big problem and the Government thinks that they should be involved(due in part to the perks these sports leagues get) then they should simply pull all of their Government backing and make the MLB, NFL and NBA deal with the same regulations that other corporations have to. Oh wait, that won't work either Also, seeing as how Mitchell is on the Board for the Red Sox, there sure does seem to be a lot of Yankees, Orioles and Blue Jays mentioned. And a definite lack of Red Sox players. This report is BS and while it may be true, to disclose it without any real proof is going to seriously open themselves up to massive lawsuits. Wouldn't you agree, Arm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forum MVP Dstone5553 Posted December 14, 2007 Author Forum MVP Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 The Mitchell Report isn't a full be all end all of who did what and so whoever is not mentioned is definitely not vindicated. Sen Mitchell had limited sources and limited information. They had BALCO in SF, they had the Radomski in New York as well as McNamee with the Yankees, and Bigbie in Baltimore. Clearly this is why the report is skewed to those teams. They didn't have any leaks in Chicago, Boston, Arizona, or half of MLB cities. I agree with all of your points Bassman but this is all sad to me because one of the great things about baseball is the history and with that history comes the stats and this entire era of stats that we've grown up watching (you and I started watching around 80 I assume)--don't even tell me you remember rooting for the yanks in 77--can't be compared to any of the other eras because of the cloud of steroids. I mean...seeing Dystra on there should not have been surprising because he was other worldly in that philly world series but I know my heart suck when I saw his name. I believed what he was doing was something special and now it just seems much less special. Same for the whole game that we love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forum MVP FunkyBass13 Posted December 14, 2007 Forum MVP Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 Again, I am NOT in favor of steriod or other performance enhancers. But this whole thing in no way changes my opinion of the sport. I view this as no worse than the strikes that we have had to suffer through. The collusion charges in the 80s. The cocaine charges in the 80s. Etc, etc, etc. Hey, I'm no saint and I don't claim to be. But I also do not expect professional athletes to be either. This is not a baseball thing. This is a professional sports thing and it is about one thing: Money. If we are going to continue to pay rediculous salaries to athletes, especially those straight out of high school or college, who haven't proven their worth yet, we are going to have these problems. If all the allegations are to be believed(which i know they aren't, but) then I view the steriod scandal in baseball in a much better light than I do the referee scandal in the NBA. At least this was many players who were all trying to get a competitive edge. In the NBA, you had a referee who was affecting the outcome of games. That's not worse?? The NBA has marginal players making $20M per year (Marbury, etc, etc, etc). I guess my point is that I don't know for certain that there wasn't widespread cheating going on before steriods anymore than I know that it won't continue to go on after the steriod era. It doesn't change the fact that baseball will continue to be my favorite sport. Would I prefer to have a level playing field? Shit yeah I would. But looking at the money that is involved with baseball......... I'm sure that corporations in other industries who make rediculous amounts of money never cut corners to make their products seem more attractive to their consumers. Does it make it right? Hardly, but I will still gladly pay my money to see my Yankees play. Not that it makes it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.